Just give me a good zoom lens, thanks

Greetings from Osttirol! My wife and I have been vacationing in Austria for the past week. It’s a gorgeous place to visit and, needless to say, I took tons of photos here. I’ve been carrying my Canon 5D and my lenses with me everywhere, and let me tell you, I’ve been sorely in need of a good zoom lens.

The lens inventory in my camera bag is woefully short at the moment. I started out with three primes: EF 24mm f/1.4L, EF 50mm f/1.4, and EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro. I sold the 24mm prime with the intention of buying the EF 24-105mm f/4L Zoom, but other circumstances intervened, and now I’ve only got the 50mm and 100mm lenses.

There are some who say it’s better to have prime lenses. I disagree. I’d like to see them carry five or six prime lenses in a backpack up and down a mountain in order to get the range that one or two good zoom lenses would give, and then tell me if they still feel the same way. And by the way, try changing lenses in swift mountain breezes, with insects buzzing around you and just dying to get inside the sensor chamber and leave smudge marks (which happened to me). Oh, and don’t forget to throw in a few other accessories such as polarizers and UV filters of various sizes for the different diameters of each lens, plus one or two water bottles and a fleece jacket plus an umbrella in case the weather goes bad, and then we’ll talk…

In a way, I was glad to only have to carry two lenses; I’d have really felt the weight of a third one. But I felt so limited in the photos I could take, because I could only use the 50mm or the 100mm lens to frame my photos. In some instances, I could walk back and forth to get a better view or angle, but in others, there was no way to get a better photo without also being able to fly — which incidentally, would be very nice, but I haven’t figured out how to do it yet. And no, I don’t believe in cropping. I only do it when I absolutely have to. I didn’t pay $2,800 for a full-frame sensor that can take 12.8 megapixel photos so I could crop them and get the same resolution I can get from a $500 camera.

To this day, I slap my head when I think that I could have had the 24-105mm zoom lens as a kit lens with my 5D for a little over half its usual price. I was such a fool not to get it! It’s a light and sharp zoom with more range than the EF 24-70mm f/2.8L, and you can easily walk around with it for hours without getting too tired.

So far on this trip (which ends very soon, unfortunately) I took 1904 photos with the 50mm prime, and 471 photos with the 100mm prime. If I had had (don’t you just love the English language) the 24-105mm zoom on my trip, it’d have stayed on my camera 95% of the time, because that’s the range I use the most, particularly on the wider end of that focal spectrum, which was not available to me, each and every day, how stupid could I be, ugh…

Look, I’m not knocking the 50mm prime, which is a great prime, and very cost effective given its low light capabilities and sharpness. And I’m definitely not knocking the 100mm prime, which is versatile and a fantastic macro lens with gorgeous bokeh. But I really didn’t need f/1.4 or macro capabilities for landscape photography, which is what I did on this trip. I needed a zoom lens!

So, if you’re not sure what lenses to get, don’t do what I did, or you’ll be frustrated to no end as well. First get a good, lightweight zoom lens, one that won’t kill your wrist as you carry your camera around taking photos. Later, as you find that you need more specific capabilities, such as being able to take handheld photos at dusk or dawn, or more bokeh, or macro photos, then spring for those primes that have the features you need.

Advertisements

Author: Raoul Pop

Entrepreneur, consultant, filmmaker, photographer and watch collector

7 thoughts on “Just give me a good zoom lens, thanks”

  1. Like I said before: good to see something new from you!

    On the lens issue. You know I mainly use the 24-70L now as my always-on lens these days. You get used to the weight pretty soon. I had the chance to use the 70-200 2.8L IS for a shoot recently. Awesome lens, but not for my usual shooting needs. I still prefer the wide angle, but I’m waiting for next (two) weeks to find out what’s up with Canon and Nikon.

    Looks like I’ll be on a job with people from both companies at Photokina and I got a glimpse at what to expect from Nikon, still working on finding out what Canon has to offer though.

    That being said, I wish you a safe trip home! Take care!

    Like

  2. I visited Austria at this time of year once. May I express my extreme jealousy to the both of you? 😉 Seriously, I look forward to seeing lots of lovely pictures. Enjoy your trip.

    Like

  3. I probably sound like a broken record, but I’ve been very pleased with my very first lens: Canon’s 28-135mm IS USM. Of all the lenses that I use and have used, I’ve gotten the most mileage out of this one, by far. It’s sharp, has IS, focuses quickly in all but the lowest light, and doesn’t weigh a ton.

    You can now get this as the kit lens with the XSi, I believe, which is a brilliant move on Canon’s part. This is one of those “mid-grade” lenses that just about anyone could happily use day-to-day.

    Like

Comments are closed.