Reviews

Book review: Digital Photography, Expert Techniques (2nd Edition) by Ken Milburn

This book is meant for “photographers who are serious about producing the highest quality photographs in the most efficient and cost-effective way possible.” That would include anyone from advanced amateur photographers to seasoned pros looking for new and more efficient ways of doing things.

Ken Milburn, the author, is a seasoned pro with lots of paid, published experience. He’s also an accomplished writer of technical works like these, in particular ones dealing with digital photography and Photoshop. What’s more, this book is now in its 2nd edition, which ought to tell you that if it was good enough to be reprinted, it’s probably worth your money.

The book is divided into twelve chapters that take you from prepping for a photo shoot to processing the photos and presenting them to the world. A great emphasis is placed on the workflow, and best practices are presented, and I might say, drilled into the reader. O’Reilly has spoiled me, because they always have good TOCs and indexes, and nice intro sections that are good stepping stones to the headier content, and this book is no different. Each chapter is summarized, so the reader knows where to look for things. What’s more, Ken’s writing is approachable and down to earth. You can tell he’s familiar with the subject matter and is also used to explaining these concepts.

Ken teaches the workflow mentioned above using the Adobe Bridge and Photoshop applications. If nothing else, Adobe applications like these have a wide reach, so you’ll be able to replicate what you learn from the book. I like the explanations that Ken offers for shooting in RAW vs. JPEG mode, and for ensuring that you are always ready to take photos, no matter the conditions. Another nice nugget is the method of eliminating noise from your photos by using Photoshop. The book is worth its price for the extensive photo retouching techniques alone. For example, have you ever wanted to know how to eliminate the bags under someone’s eyes, or take out shadows and imperfections? This is covered in the post-processing sections. As a bonus, panoramic and HDR (high dynamic range) photos are also taught. In the last chapter of the book, you’ll learn the methods of editing your photos’ embedded data (EXIF and IPTC), as well as presenting them to clients and to the world at large. This is more and more important these days as photos get posted online and can be so easily copied. Embedding information is one more way you can prove copyright.

There is one error I noticed, and that is in the recommended specs for desktops and laptops in the beginning chapter. Instead of GB, RAM is indicated in MB, as in “plug at least 1 MB of RAM into the motherboard and move up to 2+ MB as quickly as you can afford it.” I had to chuckle when I read this. It’s obvious Ken refers to GB, not MB, and I’m surprised this typo made it past the editors in the 2nd edition.

I highly recommend this book. Being an amateur photographer myself, I looked forward to reading it, and now it’s a worthwhile addition to my reference library. I learned many useful things from it, and I think you will, too.

Standard
Reviews

Born to Dance (1936)

Born to Dance (1936) is a dud to avoid, even if it’s got James Stewart in it. The music is terrible, even if it is written by Cole Porter. And even though Eleanor Powell was considered a great tap dancer back then, I couldn’t stomach her. She moved so oddly, as if her body wasn’t a whole, but two separate parts. Her legs moved to one beat while her upper body was a sort of buoy, bouncing up and down with some ill-shaped waves. Gosh, it was awful! I had to stop watching the movie midway. Where was the grace, the beauty, of the Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers dances? It sure wasn’t here. The dialogue was forgettable, the songs were unlistenable, and the dancing… yikes! Leave this movie on the shelf, gathering dust. We shouldn’t disturb its rest…

Standard
Reviews

Happy Feet (2006)

Go see Happy Feet (2006). It’s a wonderful and entertaining movie. The animation’s great, the message is inspiring, and there isn’t one dull moment. C’mon, haven’t you ever wanted to see a penguin dance? It’s hilarious! I like the message of the movie as well: if we just do our best with what we have, we’ll get our point across and get what we need. It’s also nice that the movie touches upon environmental awareness. We humans are like pigs in the way we use the environment. Seldom do we stop to think about the consequences of our behavior on nature and other species. This movie serves as a clear reminder of that problem, and it’s a good message for the kids to hear. Robin Williams is great in his three, yes three roles as Ramon, Lovelace and Cletus. As an added bonus, the other cast voices are well known names as well: Hugh Jackman, Nicole Kidman, Elijah Wood, Hugo Weaving and, posthumously, Steve Irwin, the “crocodile hunter”.

Standard
Reviews

Editing EXIF data in photos

I’ve been doing a bit of research about the ability to edit a photo’s EXIF data, and I came across four pieces of software, three of them for the PC and one for the Mac.

The first one, recommended by people in various forums, is PowerEXIF Editor, made by a company called Opanda. Everyone seems to say it’s a really powerful editor, but I find it overpriced given its features. What I’m most interested in at this point is being able to batch edit the EXIF data in my photos. I have thousands of photos I’ve got to edit, and being able to select entire sets and change the date and other info directly would be a huge help. Well, the Standard version of PowerEXIF doesn’t do this, even at $49.99, which is a fairly high price for the application’s limited scope. No, I’d have to get their Professional version, at $89.99, in order to do batch EXIF editing. I find that ridiculous. At that price, I might as well add another $100 and spring for Aperture, where I get a professional photo management application that not only edits EXIF data but allows me to work with my images in pretty wonderful ways. I wouldn’t recommend PowerEXIF at their current prices. I think they should price the Standard version at $19.99, and the Professional version at $39.99. Then I’d be tempted to purchase it.

Luckily, I found Exifer. It’s coded by a single person, Friedemann Schmidt, and it comes recommended by LifeHacker as well. It’s “postcardware”, which means you’ll “need” to send a postcard to the author if you like the software. It’s a cool concept that used to be popular in the 90’s and now it’s sort of retro-cool. For those of you unfamiliar with the concept, yes, this means it’s free. It also does batch-editing of photos, so I highly recommend you give it a try.

The third piece of software is called EXIF Pilot, and it’s shareware ($19.99). While it’s got a cleaner interface than Exifer, it won’t let you edit photos in batch-mode until you pay up. It will, however, let you edit the EXIF data of individual photos, so that’s something to keep in mind. Still, $19.99 is a reasonable price to pay given the functionality of the software, and if it indeed delivers on the promise of batch EXIF data editing, then it’s well worth it.

The fourth piece of software is Reveal, made for the Mac. It’s free, and it’s meant to be mainly an EXIF data viewer, with “limited editing capabilities”. It also doesn’t do batch editing of photos. What you do is add it to the Dock, then drag photos from iPhoto onto it to display that photo’s info. You can edit each photo individually, but it’s anyone’s guess as to whether that info gets written to the original photo itself, or to a cached iPhoto copy.

Why am I interested in EXIF data editors? Because I manage my photos in iPhoto, which does not edit EXIF data by itself. This is something that I find truly annoying. I need a way to add dates and other EXIF data to my photos. What I currently propose to do is to export the photos from iPhoto, over the network, to my Windows laptop, where I can edit entire sets with EXIF Pilot or Exifer. This all seems very unnecessary, and I should be able to edit the EXIF data directly in iPhoto, but with things being what they are, this is what I have to go through.

➡ Updated 8/16/07: Since I wrote this post, I discovered two more free utilities for photographers, created by Microsoft. They work on Windows XP, and some of their functionality is built into Vista. I’ve also switched to editing my photos entirely on my PC laptop using Adobe Photoshop Lightroom. I do most of the EXIF and IPTC editing in there, because the batch editing functionality is amazing. Sometimes I also use Microsoft Photo Info (one of the utilities) to do some further EXIF editing. But if you’re not a pro or semi-pro photographer, using the two free utilities discussed in this post should work for most of your needs.

Standard
Reviews

Cannot edit EXIF data in iPhoto

Those of us using iPhoto (up to version 6) are probably pretty disappointed to find out that we can’t edit a photo’s EXIF data. What’s more, whatever data we add to the photo (changing title, date, description, rating) also doesn’t get stored to a photo’s EXIF fields. Instead, it gets put in some other associated file, and gets lost entirely when the photo is exported out of iPhoto — for example, uploaded to Flickr.

This may not be so bad for photos that we take with our digital cameras, because they’ve already got a good amount of EXIF data stored in them, but it absolutely stinks for photos that we’ve scanned in. I’ve got all of my family’s photos in iPhoto, organized and rated and dated. A good chunk of those photos — over 60% of some 17,000 odd photos — are scanned in. That means that when I email those photos or import them into a program like Picasa on my PC, or upload them to Zooomr, all of the date information and other data that shows up in iPhoto is lost, by design (and a poor one at that). Isn’t this ridiculous? It makes all of that time spent working with the photos in iPhoto useless. They pass through the program like a duck through water. All of that “water” drips right off when the photo’s out of the app. It’s just not right.

If I can crop and adjust a photo’s color, brightness, contrast, exposure, sharpness and other parameters in iPhoto, and have those changes be preserved when I drag that photo into an email, it stands to reason that any other changes made to the photo (date, title, description, rating) should also be preserved. Otherwise, iPhoto is really not a full-fledged photo management app.

Now, I understand there are apps like Aperture, Lightroom, and of course, Photoshop, for editing photos and getting at more of a photo’s EXIF data. But not everyone wants or needs those applications. They’re meant for users who do a lot more with photos. To me, even though I have Photoshop, it seems silly to open it up just to edit the EXIF data of a photo. And I’m not going to get Aperture just to edit EXIF data. Aperture is meant for professional photographers and I’m still just an amateur photographer. This is such a basic function that it should be integrated directly into iPhoto. If the EXIF data from a photo can be viewed in iPhoto, it should also be editable, and that same data should be preserved inside the photo when it is exported to the web or for use in other applications.

Standard