Reviews

Washington National Opera's 2008 Rigoletto

This past Monday night, Ligia and I went to see WNO’s 2008 production of Verdi’s Rigoletto. Our overall impression was positive. All of the elements: cast, direction, costumes, lighting, decor, music contributed to make it a great production. There were a few things that could have been improved, and I’ll mention them below.

The Kennedy Arts Center also has its act together when it comes to taking care of its public. Free shuttles are provided from the nearest metro station (Foggy Bottom) directly to the building’s entrance, there are plenty of ushers to check tickets and direct people to their seats, the bathrooms are kept clean, and there are many concession stands in the grand foyer outside the opera hall to keep people’s appetites in check. Very nice job there.

The costumes were just wonderful: rich, colorful, beautiful — perfect. The lighting was done right: not too much, not too little. The sets were somewhat sparse, but the pieces put on stage looked fairly realistic and well-proportioned. The only problematic piece was the long feast table in Act II, which was horribly bare, and its matte paint showed all of the performers’ footsteps. I would have expected a more ornate and better-made piece for the Duke’s dining table.

The standout roles were performed by great singers, which was as expected. Carlos Alvarez did an amazing job as Rigoletto. He carried the role very well, and his voice was in top shape throughout. Joseph Calleja was great as well. He struck an imposing figure as the Duke, and his physique suited the clothes of that period well. Let’s just say he filled them in nicely. His voice was clear, wonderful and commanding.

Andrea Silvestrelli, as Sparafucile, was my personal favorite. That mountain of a man has a bass voice that makes the hall boom. It literally fills the room and makes your intestines shiver. I kid you not. And what a great guy! At the end of the performance, he proved his sense of humor by trying to crawl under the curtain to get one more round of applause!

There were a couple of roles which could have been cast better, but I’d rather not mention those people directly by name, to spare them any embarrassment. I’ll refer to them by their stage roles. Count Monterone’s voice unfortunately just couldn’t get past the orchestra. Oh, he had an impressive stage presence, but when you put all your might into the role and the audience can barely hear you, perhaps it’s not the role for you.

I wouldn’t have been so annoyed with this except the father’s curse uttered by Monterone is key to this opera. If you can’t get someone with a truly booming voice to pronounce the curse, someone that can strike fear into the hearts of the audience and blast past the orchestra, then it’s a letdown for the spectator. It’s true, Monterone’s role is a small one, and you won’t be able to get big names for it, but you should still try to get someone with a big voice, right?

Gilda was another choice that didn’t quite work out for me. The singer was charismatic and had a good stage presence, but her voice barely carried past the orchestra unless she sang high notes, where her voice was particularly strong. The orchestra helped her a bit by playing softer when she sang, but it still wasn’t quite enough. By contrast, the orchestra didn’t help Monterone. The poor fellow sang at the top of his lungs and his voice kept bouncing off the orchestral sound wall. Things didn’t quite work out for him.

In Act III, during the thunderstorm, when Rigoletto, Gilda, Sparafucile and Maddalena sing together — that’s another scene where the orchestra played too loudly and we couldn’t hear the singers. Rigoletto and Sparafucile in particular had very powerful voices, yet I could barely hear them during that particular scene because of the thunder effects and the orchestra. Shouldn’t they have adjusted their playing to allow the players’ voices to come through? After all, this was an opera, not a concert.

In spite of my gripes, Ligia and I really enjoyed ourselves. It was a great performance with many talented singers, and it was well worth our time and money. If you have a chance to go before the performances run out, do it.

[Photos courtesy of the Washington National Opera]

Standard
Reviews

One more reason why Microsoft doesn't get it

At work, I use Windows Vista Ultimate Edition. I tried to install Vista SP1 on my computer yesterday. I created a restore point, just in case something went badly, and started the install. Here’s the error message that I got:

Vista SP1 cannot install

Apparently, Vista SP1 cannot install on my machine, because I’ve got too many language packs installed. Fine, I can understand that. But what I don’t understand is why Microsoft itself kept tagging the extra language packs as “Important Updates”, basically shoving them down my throat and forcing me to install them in the first place. Don’t believe me? Hang on, I’ll give you proof of it below.

I started to remove the language packs, and the uninstall process itself is just horrible. You cannot remove more than one language pack at a time, and it takes at least 10 minutes to do it. Try it yourselves and see. It’s a three-step process. You run the uninstaller from the Control Panel, it takes a few minutes for that, then you’re prompted to reboot, you do so, it takes a few more minutes for the second step, then reboots and runs the third step, which takes the longest. It’s insanely frustrating and a big waste of time. I’m hard-pressed to think Microsoft couldn’t have come up with a better and faster way to install/uninstall language packs.

I had about 7-8 extra languages installed (other than the standard EN/FR/IT/JP). I only did it because Windows wouldn’t quit bugging me to update it by installing the language packs in the first place, and now I find I have to waste more than an hour of my time uninstalling them after having already wasted more than an hour installing them a few months ago. Thanks, Microsoft! Increased productivity my foot…

I uninstalled a few of them yesterday, and here’s the message that I got from Windows after doing that:

Windows Update: Available Updates

See those 5 important updates tagged with yellow, that Windows advises me to install in order to “enhance my computer’s security and performance”. That’s Microsoft-speak for “waste your time and decrease your computer’s performance”. Guess what they are?

Windows Update: Available Updates

As you can see, it’s the very five language packs that I uninstalled. Windows wants me to install them right back, just so I can’t upgrade to SP1. Isn’t that grand? Don’t you just love Microsoft for their obvious programming logic?

That’s exactly the same type of message I kept getting from Windows before I installed the damned things in the first place. I only installed them so Windows would leave me alone. I guess that won’t happen any time soon, because I now see the same “Available Updates” icon in the taskbar, glaring at me, nagging me to install the stupid language packs. Do you see it below? It’s the blue icon with some sort of orange satellite flying around it.

Windows taskbar available updates icon

I only hope Vista SP1 will fix this annoying behavior, but somehow I doubt it. I have a feeling I’m going to have to revert to an earlier system restore point, which would be a real shame, but then again, it would be just what I’d expect from Microsoft.

Standard
Reviews

TurboTax better this year, but still needs work

TurboTaxJust got done with my taxes. Yes! Being a long-time user of TurboTax, I’m naturally concerned with how it fares each year. I’ve been using the online version ever since it came out, and let me tell you, it’s much, much better than it was in 2006, when I had this to say about it. With that in mind, here’s what I think of it right now.

TurboTax has really improved for the 2007 tax year, but it still needs work. While it’s easy to prepare the federal tax return, and to navigate to specific sections when you need to look things up (which was a big complaint of mine in the past), you’re pretty much on your own when it comes to the error check. The messages given for the errors are almost cryptic, there are no links that explain what those fields are, and more importantly, there’s no way to go directly to those fields on the pages without exiting the error check, which defeats its purpose.

This year, I noticed that random fields were carried over from past years, unseen in the online return as I progressed through it. They showed up when I printed it, but there were nowhere to be found in the online forms.

What’s more, the error check discovered that required fields weren’t filled in when the return was prepared, but those fields simply don’t appear on the online forms, so there’s no way to fill them out until you get to the error check.

The state tax return portion of TurboTax still needs serious work. There is absolutely no guidance (field explanations, help files) when you get there. You’re completely on your own, and that sucks. It makes me wonder why I’m paying for that portion of the program. I’d actually be willing to pay more for it if TurboTax offered me real, tangible help there.

Other than the points I outlined above, I found TurboTax to be helpful and easier to use this year. I also saw that it packs more value through the addition of the two downloadable applications (QuickBooks Simple Start and Audit Support). I plan to give those a try when I get a chance, and if I have anything worthwhile to say about that experience, I’ll write about it here.

Standard
Reviews

Drobo Dashboard 1.1.1 released

Data Robotics has released version 1.1.1 of the Drobo Dashboard, for both Macs and PCs. If you already have a Drobo, chances are you’ve been prompted to upgrade. Details are a little sparse about what bugs it squashed or what new features it introduced. At any rate, it’s an easy upgrade and it went off without a hitch.

Drobo Dashboard Advanced Controls

One cool thing that I noticed about it is that it introduced a glossy new icon for the Drobo on the Mac. It looks really nice, and it helps differentiate the Drobo from the other external drives connected to the computer.

Our iMac and its external drives, including the Drobo

I wish the cool icon would show up in Windows as well, but that’s not the case, at least not with this upgrade.

Standard
Reviews

The packages return… again

I can’t make this stuff up, seriously. I had another shipment of boxes returned to me by FedEx. I was using pre-printed labels sent to me by Data Robotics themselves. I sent back two Drobos to them a week ago, and the same boxes are now sitting back in my home. One was a replacement unit that didn’t work out, and another was the original Drobo that made questionable fan and chassis noises. See my Drobo review for the details on the Drobos, if you’re interested.

The re-returned FedEx packages

You may remember that one of the RMA Drobos was returned to me already. When I called FedEx this time, I was transferred to a manager who knew how to research the problem, unlike the last time. Still, all he could tell me was that he has no idea what’s going on, and he’s never seen anything like it in the system. Great… What he “thinks” might be going on is that there’s something wrong with the prepaid shipping labels, and apparently, even though the shipper and destination addresses are printed correctly on the label, the barcode isn’t correct, and is causing the packages to be re-routed back to me.

Whatever the case may be, I fed up with yo-yo packages. I want these boxes to go to their destination, and I keep shipping them out, yet they keep coming back to me. I’ve asked Data Robotics to provide me with UPS shipping labels, and will see if UPS can manage to ship them where they belong. I’ve given FedEx two chances already, and I’m not inclined to give them another.

What I’d really like to know is why this stuff keeps happening to me… Sure, it makes for a bit of “entertainment”, but it also frustrates me to no end.

Standard